Good Vocabulary Words For Sat Essay

Auspicious. Aesthetic. Eclectic. These words may sound vaguely familiar to the teen in your house. But does he know exactly what they mean?

If he's prepping for the SAT, he should. Vocabulary for the test isn't as random as you might think. While it changes for each test sitting, there are certain stalwarts that tend to show up again and again. And if your kid knows the set, his odds of scoring will improve. A lot.

Much money has been spent on teasing out the candidates. And coaching companies aren't giving it all out for free. The Princeton Review offered us 50 words from their stash of "most frequently tested".  If nothing else, it's a good start. So drop a few of these words into dinnertime conversation and hope your kid's ears are perked:

  1. abstract not concrete
  2. aesthetic having to do with the appreciation of beauty
  3. alleviate to ease a pain or a burden
  4. ambivalent simultaneously feeling opposing feelings; uncertain
  5. apathetic feeling or showing little emotion
  6. auspicious favorable; promising
  7. benevolent well-meaning; generous
  8. candor sincerity; openness
  9. cogent convincing; reasonable
  10. comprehensive broad or complete in scope or content
  11. contemporary current, modern; from the same time
  12. conviction a fixed or strong belief
  13. diligent marked by painstaking effort; hard-working
  14. dubious doubtful; of unlikely authenticity
  15. eclectic made up of a variety of sources or styles
  16. egregious conspicuously bad or offensive
  17. exculpate to free from guilt or blame
  18. florid flowery or elaborate in style
  19. gratuitous given freely; unearned; unwarranted
  20. hackneyed worn out through overuse; trite
  21. idealize to consider perfect
  22. impartial not in favor of one side or the other; unbiased
  23. imperious arrogantly domineering or overbearing
  24. inherent inborn; built-in
  25. innovative introducing something new
  26. inveterate long established; deep-rooted; habitual
  27. laudatory giving praise
  28. maverick one who resists adherence to a group
  29. mollify to calm or soothe
  30. novel strikingly new or unusual
  31. obdurate stubborn; inflexible
  32. objectivity judgment uninfluenced by emotion
  33. obstinate stubbornly adhering to an opinion
  34. ornate elaborately decorated
  35. ostentatious describing a pretentious display
  36. paramount of chief concern or importance
  37. penitent expressing remorse for one's misdeeds
  38. pervasive dispersed throughout
  39. plausible seemingly valid or acceptable; credible
  40. profound having great depth or seriousness
  41. prosaic unimaginative; dull; ordinary
  42. quandary a state of uncertainty or perplexity
  43. rancorous hateful; marked by deep-seated ill will
  44. spurious not genuine; false; counterfeit
  45. stoic indifferent to pleasure or pain; impassive
  46. superfluous extra; unnecessary
  47. tenuous having little substance or strength; unsure; weak
  48. timorous timid; fearful
  49. transitory short-lived; temporary
  50. vindicated freed from blame

A few weeks ago, I visited a former professor at my liberal arts college to talk to her class about writing, and how a person might make a career of it, and if a person might make a career of it. Because, of course, that part remains highly debatable.

As I told the students about my post-graduate experience, during which I transitioned from copy editing and managing the production of print magazines to writing for online venues – to blogging, that word sure to be outdated beyond recognition soon enough – and then, for goodness sakes, to finishing an actual paper-and-ink book, I had a nostalgic thought.

“Do you guys still use those little blue books, for exams?” I asked. When I went to this college in the late 1990s, the squat paper notebooks were pretty much always provided for students in which to pen – or, rather, pencil – their final essays, in the allotted time, during class. By hand. From whatever was in our brains, without a book or a computer to rely on. I remember an occasional proud moment when I had so much to say that I could fill two blue books; that was a sure sign of an A. I don’t remember my hand cramping the way it does today when I write a three-sentence note sans keyboard.

The students – sophomores and juniors and seniors with iPhones and laptops within an arm’s reach – shook their heads, perplexed, and even my teacher couldn’t remember the last time the blue books had been used. “See, I’m really ancient,” I said, laughing, knowing full well that nowadays, paper and pencil scribblings aren’t the most useful or efficient way to showcase a student’s expertise. At the same time, I couldn’t help feeling just a bit misty about those old bound brochures, empty and waiting for my thoughts as they’d been at the time.

This is not all that different from how I feel about Wednesday’s news from the College Board that the SAT, the venerable old SAT, is changing. Of course, it had already changed from what it was when I took it by hand, a test witha total score of 1600 upon which I predictably did well at verbal and fairly poorly in math. In the time since then, it gained an essay portion, changed the total score possible, and now with the latest changes the essay is optional and the SAT is back to a ceiling of 1600 again.

What I remember most about studying for the SAT is that I just kept studying verbal when I should have been practicing math. I made flashcards of words I’d read once in books or had never read at all and was discovering for the first time. I guess as a word nerd I was a little bit in love with vocabulary then, just as I am today.

Vocabulary, however, is something that will be very different in the new SAT. As Julia Ryan writes at The Atlantic, “The era of ‘SAT words’ is over.” Instead of testing on “inchoate”, “pertinacious” and “toady”, the exam will put forth words “widely used in college and career”, like “synthesis” and “empirical”. (For what it’s worth, I’ve used “inchoate” and “toady” in my career, but I just had to Google “pertinacious” for a refresher.) The College Board, one might say, has not been pertinacious with regard to its vision for the SAT.

The intention behind this overhaul is indisputably good, to make college more accessible for low-income students, and to more fairly assess college and career readiness across boards that are not confined to students who can afford to pay for expensive SAT tutors. But as we become more and more practical in preparing for college, careers and life, we necessarily let go of some of the deep, uncharted and individual aspects of learning. If the SAT is simply a test of what students have already learned in school, they’ve lost the chance to discover new loves in studying for the SAT. Like the word contumacious! Lugubrious! Alacrity!And whether we remember or use everything we crammed into our brains for a single score, the act of studying those things has changed us and, quite possibly, led us to the careers in which we find ourselves many years later.

A college admission test is never the whole picture of a student, of course. But I can’t help feeling sentimental about my time spent studying vocabulary words, and a dash lugubrious that others won’t have that same experience. If I hadn’t had to learn them for the SAT, I might not have discovered them in the first place. (Then again, perhaps it was only amatter of time.) As for writing essays, well, I don’t much care if aspiring college students are writing them in blue books or private journals or on Tumblr or on the SAT. The important thing is that essays continue to be written, and I think they will be.

I do, however, take umbrage with one thing Dr Les Perelman, director of undergraduate writing at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told David Coleman in 2012, before Coleman became president of the College Board. As Todd Balf writes in this weekend’s New York Times Magazine, Perelman asked:

When is there a situation in either college or life when you’re asked to write on demand about something you’ve never once thought about?

For anyone who writes, or blogs, as a career, well, that’s pretty often – though of course, we’re not doing it in blue books anymore.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *