Essay On Palace Of Versailles

When the triumphant Donald Trump welcomed Nigel Farage to his $100 million penthouse apartment in Trump Tower on 13 November, the two posed in his lift of gleaming gold. Trump’s hyper-bling apartment is his Versailles fantasy, where the oversized mirrors, picture-frames and furnishings speak of the wealth and power of America’s new Sun King. Despite the massive scale of his apartment, however, the furnishings are garish rather than exquisite, cluttered and over-large rather than inviting. But he is keen for us to take a virtual tour of his temple of tawdriness:

Versailles sells big. Versailles, the most expensive television series ever made in France, screened this year on SBS. It gives the impression that the courtiers spent their time indulging in outrageous fun when not having sex or killing each other. While hugely popular in France, its producers made a deliberate and canny decision to cast English actors speaking an English script.

The timing is perfect for the National Gallery of Australia’s “blockbuster” exhibition Versailles, Treasures from the Palace, opening today. The exhibition of more than 130 pieces is a stunning array of brilliant craftsmanship, almost all from the Museum of Versailles itself and from the Louvre. The objects in the exhibition have not left France – or even Versailles – before. It is a triumph for the NGA and for its Director Gerard Vaughan.

The objects range from the court painter Hyacinthe Rigaud’s famous portrait of Louis XIV (1712) to huge, ornamental vases in marble, porphyry and bronze, and even a section of parquetry floor from Versailles. There are exquisite items from Marie-Antoinette’s “pearls and cornflowers” dining service manufactured in 1781 by the Royal Porcelain Factory at Sèvres.

There are plans and keys for the intricate hydraulics for the gardens’ waterworks, even nozzles from the Latona fountain located in the grounds of Versailles. Indeed, the highlight of the exhibition is probably the two-metre high marble carving of the goddess Latona and her children sculpted in 1668-70 by the brothers Gaspard and Balthazard Marsy, weighing 1.5 tonnes. Not far behind in sumptuous elegance is Jean-Joseph Lemaire’s astonishingly intricate carved and gilded wood barometer (1773-75), weighing a modest 150 kg.

The NGA assures us that the exhibition “will celebrate the lives, loves and passions of the people of Versailles”. The Moët & Chandon special “champagne package” reminds us that “the champagne-infused hedonism of Versailles is legendary”; a French master perfumer has created a special perfume for the show based on Louis XIV’s favourite orange blossom flower. Indeed, we are offered glimpses into nightly entertainments (divertissements) in a rich series of drawings of the court at play. Unsurprisingly, the lives of those who laboured to provide the construction and maintenance, the cooking and cleaning are not captured here.

Power, rivalry and drudgery

The great fantasy and attraction of the world of Versailles has always been that the opulence and divertissements of its owners and their friends were a “way of life”. Ten million tourists flock to Versailles annually to imagine courtly life in such sumptuous surroundings. But Versailles was also about awesome royal power, intense rivalries, brilliant craftsmanship and engineering, and – for those who did the manual labour – drudgery and deference.

The construction of the palace at Versailles, about 20 km from Paris, was the initiative of Louis XIV (king of France 1643-1715). The project lasted a half-century, from about 1660 to 1710, but by 1682 sufficient work had been done for Louis to move his capital there from Paris. At the death of the Sun King in 1715, the village of Versailles – with a population of just 1,000 at the time of his accession in 1643 – had turned into a city of approximately 30,000 inhabitants.

The final cost of the palace, with its 700 rooms, 1,250 fireplaces and garden façade of 575 metres is impossible to ascertain, since much of the manual labour was done by soldiers when not at war. But it was certainly several billions in today’s terms – and as much again has been spent on restoration since 1950.

The palace was redolent of the might of a monarch with absolute powers – responsible to God alone for the wellbeing of his people. The Sun King’s successors – Louis XV (1715-74) and Louis XVI (1774-93) – continued the awe-inspiring display of majesty. By 1789, there were about 60,000 inhabitants, and 10 per cent of the monarchy’s annual tax revenues were spent on the palace and its surrounds.

The last Louis – tragically incompetent politically – had several obsessive passions, and his love of killing animals is well reflected in the exhibition, as befits a palace constructed where once there had been just a hunting lodge.

Versailles was dominated by several thousand courtiers from the most eminent noble families in the kingdom (les Grands), the magistrates of the high courts and senior administrators.

As a boy king of 10 in 1648, Louis XIV was to endure five years of brutal civil wars (the “Fronde”) between aristocratic factions and their retinues. Indeed, one of his original intentions had been to undermine the chance of another Fronde by requiring his most powerful noble families to spend part of each year at Versailles, “in a gilded cage” as one of them quipped. From the Fronde emerged absolute or “divine right” monarchy and centralised, hierarchical government, and Versailles was to be their architectural form.

The élite of the nobility was fractured by intricate hierarchies of status and prerogative: for example, between those who had been formally presented at court, those permitted to sit on a footstool in the queen’s presence, and those even permitted to ride in her carriage. These were not empty symbols: the family of the Queen’s favourite the Duchesse de Polignac received 438,000 livres annually in pensions and salaries (by way of comparison, parish priests commonly received less than 1,000 livres).

One of the most eminent nobles, Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord — who entered the priesthood aged 25 rather than the army because of a congenital leg limp, and was ordained a bishop just 10 years later, in January 1789 — described the nobility as “a cascade of contempt”. What all nobles had in common, however, was a vested interest in a system of status and hierarchy from which came material privilege, status and preferment. Versailles was the heart of the system.

The shadow of revolution

Versailles represented territorial grandeur as well as symbolic power. In 1659, the Treaty of the Pyrenees between France and Spain not only marked the boundaries of the two kingdoms through Catalonia and the Basque country but also recognized the northern region of Artois as French.

This expansion is represented in the exhibition by the work of the court painter Hyacinthe Rigaud, a Catalan, and the painting of the ceremonial entry of Louis XIV and Queen Marie-Thérèse into Arras, the capital of Artois, in 1667. Louis XVI’s interest in expanding the French Empire after the loss of Canada in 1763 is reflected in Monsiau’s painting of him giving instructions to La Perouse in 1785 before his expedition to the South Pacific.

There are portraits of Louis XV’s mistress Madame de Pompadour as the “beautiful gardener”, and of her successor Madame du Barry as “Flora”. But the finest portraits in the exhibition are a series by the court painter Élisabeth Louise Vigée le Brun, of Queen Marie-Antoinette and two of her most eminent ladies at court, the Duchesse de Polignac and the Comtesse de Ségur. Polignac, like Marie-Antoinette, lost her life during the French Revolution, the shadow of which looms over the exhibition.

The “absolute” monarchy ruled over and held together a society based on the landed property and corporate privileges of the aristocracy and the Church. The power and wealth of these elites was based on their control over the labour of the more than four-fifths of the population who were peasants. France was a society of mass poverty as well as opulence, and at the centre of social control was the monopoly of awesome armed force by the monarchy. Punishments for commoners — particularly the poor — were severe and designed to be exemplary. But among those commoners were educated, successful professionals and business people - known as “bourgeois” - whose distance from social status and decision-making increasingly rankled.

One of the most significant objects in the exhibition is a small pen and sepia wash painting done in 1791 by the greatest painter of the age, Jacques-Louis David: The Oath of the Tennis Court at Versailles, 20 June 1789.

David was commissioned by the revolutionary National Assembly of 1789 to commemorate the first great act of the French Revolution, when commoner deputies to a national consultation convened to offer advice to Louis XVI took a revolutionary oath to act as a parliament and to draft a constitution.

David never completed the painting. But the Oath – taken in an indoor royal tennis court still standing in Versailles – was a decisive first step in the destruction of the king’s claim to absolute authority legitimised by divine right.

Despite the Tennis Court Oath, the storming of the Bastille in Paris on 14 July, and the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen in August, the victory of the Revolution was uncertain.

Louis hesitated to give his assent to the Declaration. Claims multiplied of open contempt for the Revolution on the part of aristocrats: for example, after a banquet at Versailles on 1 October, there were reports that the new tricolour national cockade or badge had been besmirched by drunken noble army officers.

Again, the working people of Paris intervened to safeguard a revolution they assumed to be theirs. This time, however, it was particularly the women of the markets. On 5 October, up to 20,000 women marched the 20 kilometres to Versailles to demand cheaper bread and royal assent to the Declaration.

Louis had already left to go shooting (rather than hunting: this was his concession to political tensions, since he would be easier to contact if not in full hunt). Louis’ diary for the 5th records that he “shot at the Porte de Châtillon. Killed 81 head. Interrupted by events”. He was back at Versailles by three in the afternoon. It was the last time he would have freedom to choose between hunting and shooting.

Once at Versailles, the women invaded the Assembly. A deputation of them was then presented to the king, who promptly agreed to sanction the Declaration. The king kept going to the balcony at Versailles with the intention of appeasing the crowd but was too overwrought to be able to say anything.

It soon became apparent that the women would be satisfied only if the royal family returned to Paris; on the 6th it did so, the National Assembly in its wake. This was a decisive moment in the Revolution of 1789.

Less than four years later, Louis would go to the guillotine, after composing his final will and testament on 20 January 1793, memorialised in a painting by Henri-Pierre Danloux in the exhibition.

Stripped of finery

After the Revolution of 1789, the palace of Versailles was stripped of much of its finery. As the town’s population and wealth dwindled, local rage was vented on those blamed for preventing the full fruits of the Revolution from being harvested.

At the peak of revolutionary crisis in September 1792, when Austrian and Prussian troops invaded France in a bid to restore the ancien régime, a Versailles crowd attacked 50 royalist prisoners being deported in chains from Orléans through Versailles to Paris. Forty four heads were impaled on the spikes of the gates to the royal palace.

The population of the town fell to just 27,000 by 1800. The palace itself was saved by the intervention of Louis XVI’s cousin, king Louis-Philippe (1830-48). Even though his radical father – the self-styled Philippe-Égalité – had voted for the death of Louis XVI in 1793, Louis-Philippe converted the palace into a national museum.

One more time, in 1871, Versailles became the capital of France when the French government and parliament fled Paris after the eruption of the socialist Paris Commune; but eight years later, with the Third Republic firmly established, a new political majority returned to Paris, definitively.

The palace of Versailles now has iconic status in popular culture, representing as it does the ultimate statement of skilled craftsmanship, ostentatious consumption and aristocratic insouciance and frivolity, whether represented in Jennifer Saunders and Dawn French’s 1999 comedy series, Let Them Eat Cake, Sofia Coppola’s 2006 film Marie-Antoinette, or the Assassin’s Creed video games.

In contrast, the Catalan director Albert Serra’s 2016 The Death of Louis XIV (La Mort de Louis XIV) captures brilliantly the claustrophobic constraints of medical knowledge and courtly power during Louis’ horrible decline.

But the palace of Versailles also represents seismic shifts in political culture, from provincial aristocratic power to absolute monarchy and then to democracy, during the long 18th century when France was la Grande Nation.

To return to the US President-elect, Donald Trump, the symbolic opulence of faux-Versailles may be irresistible, but the competing claims of voters pose challenges of expectations that never had to concern Louis XIV in his construction of one of the world’s great palaces.

Treasures from the Palace is a precious opportunity to relish both astonishing skill in the creation of objects and to ponder the politics of magnificent display.

Versailles Treasures from the Palace is at the NGA from 9 December 2016 – 17 April 2017


Relevant further reading:

A study of Versailles by the Director who oversaw the restoration projects since the 1950s is Gérald van der Kemp, Versailles: the Palace, the Park, the Trianon (Versailles: Éditions d'art Lys, 1976).

An excellent guide book is Jean-Jacques Lévêque, Versailles, the Palace of the Monarchy (Paris: ACR, 2000).

A classic study of the place of ritual in the creation of absolutism by Norbert Elias, The Court Society (London: Basil Blackwell, 1983).

An excellent introduction to eighteenth-century France by Daniel Roche, France in the Enlightenment, translated by Arthur Goldhammer (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).

A recent history of the Revolution by Peter McPhee, Liberty or Death. The French Revolution (London: Yale University Press, 2016).


Peter McPhee will be online to answer questions throughout the day. Post any questions you have in the comments below.

Palace Of Versailles Essay

The Palace of Versailles was the official home of the Kings of France from 1682 until 1790. Originally, a hunting lodge built in 1624 by Louis XIII, but then was expanded by Louis XIV in the beginning of 1669. With beautiful architecture and amazing landscape, it is one of the most well- known and beautiful palaces in France. Its garden is so unique and one of Europe's largest. It played a huge responsibility in French government and was used for some of the biggest meetings of Kings and Queens. It is a very reflective place for the French and showed a basis of culture for the people. The small structure became the base on which was constructed into one of the most extravagant buildings in the world. The Palace of Versailles is a famous French landmark due to its elaborate construction, its role as a center of government, and its influence on French culture.
The architecture of Versailles makes it one of the most elaborate and detailed structures in history. Its amazing detail gives it the royal feeling that its send to people every day. "Built by Louis XIV, it was transformed into an immense and extravagant complex surrounded by a stylized English and French gardens; every detail of its construction glorified the king." ("Versailles, Palace of." Encyclopedia Britannica) I ts garden is one of the most well-known and largest with its tree-lined paths, flowerbeds, fountains, and lakes. The king was extremely happy with what he had built for himself, his officials, and his people. He tried to make it the best possible for everyone and have a representable landmark for France. "The Baroque style of the architecture characteristic of Versailles impresses people by its luxury, with its colossal murals, rows of monumental statues, and an immense collection of fine furniture inside the palace." (Historylines Versailles) These specials touches inside the palace made the Baroque style of the architecture really stand out. The valuable and precious furniture inside the palace is the main items that really strike the visitors when entering the palace. Going through much remodeling and reconstruction, expansion of the palace was on the biggest undergoes it went through. "In 1678, the palace was extended with the construction of north and south wings by the architect Jules Hardouin-Mansart, who also built Le Grand Trianon palace." ("Versailles". The Hutchinson Unabridged Encyclopedia with Atlas and Weather Guide.) This building process continued for another 10 years under his eyes. He changed many things on the exterior and interior of Versailles. Not only was the garden and the inside of the palace something that stood out for people, but the amazing size of Versailles was also something that caught the eye. "The size of the palace is going to take over 20,000 acres and has hundreds of rooms, almost taking 27 years to build." (Varela) Most famous for its Hall of Mirrors, the palace had over a hundred rooms and with its huge area of property, the king was...

Loading: Checking Spelling

0%

Read more

The Legacy of Louis XIV Essay

1464 words - 6 pages "L'état c'est moi," (I am the state). These were the words of the Sun King to the Parliament of Paris in 1655. He stated: there is no procedure, no judiciary or legislature, and no deliberations. He could write a letter and declare anyone he wanted to be arrested, for whatever reason. King Louis could decide to go to war. He could make laws and repeal them on a whim (Biography, Cranny pg.62). As a leader, Louis XIV used war to try and...

King Louis XIV Essay

1502 words - 6 pages King Louis XIV By the time Louis XIV came to power in 1643 at the tender young age of five. The king was made progressively aware that France indeed needed large amounts of money to pull themselves out of bankruptcies and later on to be able to get the luxuries, which would become available at the court of France. Louis XIV born in 1638 reined France from 1643- 1715, which is the longest reign in European...

Biography of LouisXIV

719 words - 3 pages Louis the Fourteenth was a very unique ruler, and also a great king of France.Louis expressed his unique and great side in many ways, but the main ways are throughthe path of his early years in which we watch young Louis grow into a unique but greatking. His greatness also shines through during his prime years where Louis does manywonderful things. We also experience the wonders of Louis the Fourteenth by his...

Farewell, My Queen Historical analysis

1104 words - 4 pages Bridget KlineAPWHSummer AssignmentFarewell, My Queen by Chantal Thomas Farewell, My Queen was originally written in French by...

Baroque Style Basilicas

1192 words - 5 pages Baroque Artwork Throughout the Baroque Ages, many artists created paintings and sculptors due to their great religious beliefs or creativity during their time. It was the beginning of new masterpieces and the show of how creative the arts could be. Out of these masterpieces, there were three famous buildings that contained the most extravagant artwork. They are the St. Peter’s Basilica, the Versailles, and the Hampton Court. These works had...

The Peace Treaty That Ended Peace: The Treaty of Versailles

1828 words - 7 pages At the conclusion of the devastating first Word War, European nations had no interest in fighting another war; however, lingering feelings of animosity and aspirations for revenge on Germany would result in one of the deadliest wars in history. On January 18, 1919, delegates from thirty-two countries met in the Palace of Versailles, France to negotiate peace and determine the fate of Germany. After a year of heated debates, a series of severe...

King Louis XIV: A Disastrous Ruler

986 words - 4 pages King Louis XIV: A Disastrous Ruler It is often debated whether or not the reign of King Louis XIV had a positive or negative effect on France. Although there were improvements during his reign in transportation, culture, and national defense, there were far more negative aspects. He depleted the national treasury with his liberal spending on personal luxuries and massive monuments. His extreme fear of the loss of power led to...

How much did the outcomes of the treaties reflect the leadership personalities of France, Germany and Great Britain?

814 words - 3 pages The three leadership personalities of France, Germany and Great Britain were commonly referred to as "The Big Three", they involved Wilson of America, Lloyd George of Britain and Clemenceau of France. The Treaty of Versailles reflected these three personalities greatly, but some greater than others.The Treaty of Versailles was the peace settlement signed after World War One had ended in 1918 and in the shadow of the Russian Revolution...

Should We Bow to Louis XIV?

1253 words - 5 pages Should We Bow to Louis XIV? Louis XIV, ruler of France for 72 years, is known for stabilizing France and making the country a strong European power. However, many of his projects were costly and caused economic problems for the nation. His personal lavish luxuries also were a financial burden to France. By the end of his reign, nearly all of the land he had acquired through warfare had to be returned, thus wasting enormous...

Hitler and the Effects of Treaty of Versailles

2421 words - 10 pages On June 28th 1919, in the Versailles Palace of France, the treaty of Versailles officially ended World war one. The signers of this treaty implemented certain restrictions on Germany that were to guarantee Germany would never start another world war. This begs the question, “what did the end of one war have to do with the start of World War Two?”. The evidence shows that it was this treaty’s influence on Adolf Hitler that led to the...

The Start of the French Revolution

1433 words - 6 pages The Start of the French Revolution The disappointed reactions of the enraged Third Estate members who stood knocking violently at the door of the Hotel des Menus when they were locked out on June 20, 1789. The reason the Estates General was going to meet on this day was because of a recent voting conflict between the Estates General that had put the estates in deadlock for days. The Third Estate desired a change in the voting in the...

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *